Celebrities News●0 min read●
Gautam Adani Ties With Bill Gates To Become The 4th Richest Person In The World
- The extended bull run in Adani Group Companies has catapulted Gautam Adani as the 4th richest person in the world.
- The Gujarat-based Tycoon’s wealth is now in the same row as Bill Gates in terms of net worth, as per the Bloomberg Ranking.
- Over the past few months, his net worth soared as shares of Adani Group have been through rapid success over some time.
Adani Group Chairman #GautamAdani is now the 4th Richest person in the world after being tied with Microsoft Cofounder Bill Gates. His fortune surged to $125 billion, on par with Bill Gate’s Net With
Continue reading to get the deets….
Adani Added 2/3rd To His Wealth In 2022 Alone
Nothing would be enough to elucidate Gautam Adani’s stupendous rise on the list of the world’s richest persons. The 59-year-old billionaire added $48 billion to his net worth in 2022. If this pace continues, he is on the verge of becoming the 3rd richest person globally by the end of this week.
Top 4 Richest Persons On The Planet – The Bloomberg Billionaires Index
As you can visualize from the Billionaires Index below, it’s Adani whose change in present wealth didn’t go red in contrast with the top 4 personalities. While Arnault encountered most losses at $43.7 billion, his total assets got boosted by $6 billion yesterday alone.
|Rank||Name||Present Wealth||Last Changes|
|1st Position||Elon Musk||$252 Billion||-$5.5 billion|
|2nd Position||Jeff Bezos||$165 Billion||-$6.8 billion|
|3rd Position||Bernard Arnault||$134 Billion||-$1.9 billion|
|4th Position||Bill Gates||$125 Billion||-$1.7 billion|
|Tied 4th position||Gautam Adani||$125 Billion||$6.3 billion|
Read more : Richest Man In The World
Earlier this month, Gautam Adani stepped his feet into centibillionaires club as the Indian Businessman possessing a fortune of more than $100 billion. From Asia, only Adani and Ambani could enter in this club. Let’s take a minute to give a big round of applause to the two Indian Legends, shall we?